Showing posts with label early buzz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label early buzz. Show all posts

Could Andy Serkis be in the conversation for an acting nomination again?

The Hollywood Reporter seems to think so:

The Rise of the Planet of the Apes, with its photoreal visual effects, is sure to be a major factor in this year's visual effects Oscar race. The bigger awards question surrounding the film, which 20th Century Fox will release Aug. 5, is whether Andy Serkis, the actor who portrays the ape Caesar, will be considered a contender for an acting nomination.

That honor eluded him ten years ago when he played the tragic creature Gollum in The Lord of the Rings. That role, however, did launch an ongoing Hollywood debate about how much an actor contributes to CG characters who are created through performance capture.

WETA Digital, the Wellington, N.Z.-based VFX company behind both Rings and Apes, has always maintained that the actor drives the performance of its CG creations. "Performance capture (is) really (designed) to give you the actors' moment--the spontaneity, the thought, the insight that really comes from an actor who really truly understands his role," says WETA's four-time Oscar winning VFX supervisor Joe Letteri.

Over the years, understanding of the technique has grown and many filmmakers have spoken out on that position, including James Cameron, who used performance capture and worked with WETA to realize Avatar.

To bolster its position, on Thursday, WETA held a preview and discussion about Apes at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena at which director Rupert Wyatt treated the audience to some exclusive clips of his upcoming film. He and Letteri also discussed the innovative visual effects. And Serkis -- who was in the U.K. but participated in the discussion via Skype -- offered the actor's perspective.

Wyatt -- who calls Serkis the "Charlie Chaplin of our time" -- explained that his film is essentially a reboot, an original story, that takes place before the events depicted in 1968's The Planet of the Apes. "We are working our way toward the original film ... but our film is set in 2011," he said.

The first clip he introduced showed Caesar's' agitated mother, who, echoing the original film, is referred to as "bright eyes." She has been pulled from the jungle to be used in a research project looking for a cure for Alzheimer's.

In the second clip, it is revealed that her aggression was an effort to protect her baby, which scientist Will Rodman, played by James Franco, takes home to nurture. The audience then saw a growing Caesar, who gets aggressive to protect Will's father, portrayed by John Lithgow, who is showing signs of Alzheimer's himself.

Wyatt next introduced a clip where Caesar is separated from his human family and placed in an oppressive facility with other apes.

Another sequence showed how Caesar continues to develop in his new environment. "He uses his intelligence and his wits to rise through the ranks and become the alpha," Wyatt explained. "He turns the tables not only on them, but also on us."

In those scenes, Serkis' performance shows a range of emotions -- joy, love, vulnerability, aggression and terror. Explained Serkis, "This is an ape who has been brought up with human beings. He believes he is loved; he is an innocent. Then he has a moment of self-awareness when he realizes he is a freak and then is thrown into a hard-core prison and then leads a revolution."

There were no real apes used in making Rise of the Planet of the Apes. The director relied completely on the skills of WETA -- whose work has earned Oscars for The Lord of the Rings trilogy, King Kongand Avatar -- to create the photoreal cast that "has a soul when you look into their eyes."

To get that look, the filmmakers did extensive research, which included time spent at the Wellington Zoo. Letteri showed video of apes, including one that Wyatt said was "Andy's inspiration for Caesar."

"There's the look, the physicality -- bones, muscle, tissue, fur," Letteri said. "In a way, that is just the starting point, what we are really after is the performance."

For Apes, the performance capture method used was an extension of WETA's techniques that were employed in Avatar. For Cameron's film -- where the avatars were supposed to be 10 ft. tall -- the actors worked on a motion capture stage, the area where the performance capture takes place, which is covered by motion capture cameras.

Letteri explained that since the apes were human in size, "it made sense to put them in the scene." So Serkis performed on the regular live-action sets with the other actors, including Franco, Lithgow andFreida Pinto.

"It's no different than live action acting," Serkis added. "And I never considered (performance capture) anything else but live action acting. You are reacting and acting with other people."

-Joey's Two Cents: I think he deserved to be in the conversation for King Kong, so I suppose this is another opportunity...thoughts?

Super 8 has been seen by a select few...what's the early word?

Well, it's pretty positive, with some people even talking it up for a Best Picture nomination. Here's the compilation of the buzz from /Film:

The first public screening of JJ AbramsSuper 8 took place this Saturday in Hollywood. A few movie journalists were in attendance, and today Paramount Pictures gave word that we were allowed to “tweet about your thoughts on the film” before the review embargo breaks on June 1st. I’m sure more than a few of you already follow me on Twitter and already heard what I thought (if you don’t, you can find my tweets on @slashfilm). I’ve decided to do a round up of all the early tweet reactions to the film. Hit the jump to find out what people thought of Super 8.

Slashfilm: Loved it, they don’t make these types of movies anymore. The best thing I can say about the film is that I loved the characters/setting/tone so much that I probably would have enjoyed it just as much as a Stand By Me-like coming of age drama without the sci-fi/train crash/action. Its one of those films that feels like it was made just for me. (someone asked if its more E.T. or Cloverfield, I responded: It’s Cloverfield with the characters and setting of E.T.)

FirstShowing: absolutely loved it, lived up to my high expectations. Felt like watching an Amblin classic. Of course, it’s expected I’d love it, considering how excited I was for it, but yes, it’s that good. Really need to see it again!

Collider: It’s great. Made me feel like a kid again

Jen Yamato: I enjoyed Super 8′s Goonies vibe; the kids are great. Has its problems, but none are deal breakers for me…though they will be for others.

LA Times Hero Complex: Remember how the academy expanded the best picture race to include crowdpleasers and sublime spectacle films? Meet “Super 8″…

More after the jump...

Devincf: If JJ Abrams ever got a good script he would be an amazing director. SUPER 8 script is a huge mess. SUPER 8 simply has no idea what kind of movie it wants to be. Kids are great, looks nice, has no throughline…

Jenna Busch: #Super8 is AMAZING!!!! Nostalgic, action-packed and just damn entertaining! Woot!

Meli_Molina: Yeppers, I certainly did like it quite a bunch.

JimmyO: Super 8 is pure movie magic! Let’s just say it is truly spectacular!

BloodyDisgusting: On a positive note, I can reveal I have seen Super 8 and LOVED it.

STYD News: Cool monster mash w/terrific ensemble cast. Nostalgia might blind you to its problems. Still, I liked it. Full review to come!

Steve Barton: Wow. Just wow. Days later I’m still happy it’s like Christmas for monster movie fans!

BDK Reviews: Easily the best movie of 2011 so far!

JRothC: It was everything I wanted it to be. A coming-of-age sci-fi adventure like the classics I love. Super 8′s great for older kids AND grown-ups who long for the classic sci-fi films of the late ’70s and ’80s. Longer review to come — but I loved it — think you will too!

ThomasLeupp: ‘Super 8′ is terrific: very scary, surprisingly funny, only slightly marred by forced Spielbergian sentiment.

TreyAlexMovies: Super 8 is an adventurous blast! A thriller with a heart and laughs. Abrams and Spielberg are a great team.

Manny Movies: SUPER 8 is funny, spooky, haunting, uplifting…old school filmmaking at its finest…YOU WILL LOVE IT!

JakesTakes: Congratulations, JJ Abrams. You just made the best movie of 2011

stevezaragoza: AMAZING, WONDERFUL, SUPERB, HEARTWARMING, EXCITING, SPECTACULAR! Now who wants to touch me?!

RowenetReview: I loved it! Check it out when it comes out June 10! Best movie I’ve seen all year.

lukesingleton: absolutely loved it, lived up to my high expectations. Felt like watching an Amblin classic.

-Joey's Two Cents: My anticipation for this flick is skyrocketing. Honestly, there's very little this summer I want to see more...thoughts?

What's the early buzz on Drive after its first Cannes screening?

Well, /Film has the first reactions, and they're pretty positive:

The first Cannes screening of Drive, the new film from Nicolas Winding Refn that stars Ryan Gosling, Carey Mulligan, Bryan Cranston and Albert Brooks, ended not long ago. Reviews aren’t up yet, but a sampling of Twitter reactions suggests the movie has one of the most positive consensus opinions of the Cannes premieres so far — I think only We Need to Talk About Kevin and The Artist rival it for near-unanimity of positive opinion.

Check out a few reactions after the break.

A few initial Tweets, which might be chalked up to post-screening festival highs, hit right after the film was out. Let’s kick things off right. Guy Lodge from In Contention says: “DRIVE (A-) I won’t lie to you: I pretty much want to have sex with this movie. Hot, clipped, nasty, beautiful. Best thing in Competition.”

An additional Twitter sampling offers:

Eric Kohn: Walking out of DRIVE, feeling kinda wobbly. In a good way.

FirstShowing: “Nicolas Winding Refn’s Drive – Totally frickin’ awesome. Violent, but badass, great soundtrack. Ryan Goslingis the man. Loved it, new fave.”

Rope of Silicon: “‘Drive’ was a great way to end my time here in Cannes, really enjoyed and fans of Refn are in for a treat.”

IonCinema: “Cannes 2011: Refn’s DRIVE. More focus on the driving gloves than the cars. This one has got a mean streak and softer side: cult classic.”

Mike D’Angelo (Onion AV Club): “Let’s see if I can be the first person in your feed to say: DRIVE, holy shit.” and “Let’s see if I can be the first person in @albertbrooks ‘s feed to say: Dude, HOLY SHIT.”

But ‘holy shit’ can mean a lot of things. Not long afterward, Mr. D’Angelo got down to a slightly more measured take, which still makes the film sound like a success:

Drive (Winding Refn): 76. Patchy and shallow, but the highs are just insanely high. Half a dozen of the year’s best scenes. Genre bliss… And it’s not THE DRIVER II, either. Surprisingly little auto action. It should really be called LOOK given how predicated it is on faces…

And Jeff Wells chimed in with,

“Drive” isn’t as good as ” Thief,” but it’s respectably and sometimes very thrillingly in the same ballpark. Spare, hard, very high octane… All stand back & admire Albert Brooks for his older, smart-mouthed tough guy with a toupee in “Drive”…yay, Albert!… Ryan Gosling’s hard-guy, Steve McQueen character in “Drive,” but what there is he plays the he’ll put of. His first action film…wham!

Chase from Gordon and the Whale sounded one of the sour notes I’ve seen so far: “DRIVE made me really, really sad; I wanted to like it so much.”

-Joey's Two Cents: I've felt like this might be a dark horse for some awards citations since before the fest started, so perhaps I was on to something...thoughts?